Useful Resources: reading material

  • Bowater, L., & Yeoman, K. (2013). Science communication: A practical guide for scientists. Chichester, West Sussex; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Burns, T.W., O’Connor, D.J., Stocklmayer, S. M.  (2003). Science Communication: a contemporary definition. Research Prospective, Sage publications.
  • Durant, J., Evans, G.A., Thomas, G. P. (1989). Why should we promote the public understanding of science?. The public understanding of science.  Nature 340: 11–14.
  • Effective Communication, Better Science.
  • European Commission general guidelines for developing a business plan.
  • Gregory, Jane; Miller, Steve (1998). Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. New York: Plenum Trade.
  • Groulx, M., Brisbois, M. C., Lemieux, C. J., Winegardner, A., & Fishback, L. (2017). A Role for Nature-Based Citizen Science in Promoting Individual and Collective Climate Change Action? A Systematic Review of Learning Outcomes. Science Communication, 39(1), 45–76
  • Jouber, M. et al. (2019). ‘Storytelling: the soul of science communication.’ In Stories in Science Communication. JCOM publishing.
  • Kenneth Louis Smith et al. (2005). Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods, and Media. 45-62, Routelange.
  • Martin, R.L., Osberg, S. (n.d.). Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition (SSIR). Retrieved November 06, 2020, from
  • Miller, J.D.  (1992) Toward a scientific understanding of the public understanding of science and technology, Public Understanding of Science. 23–26.
  • Patel, N. (2015). 13 Tips on How to Deliver a Pitch Investors Simply Can’t Turn Down. Retrieved November 06, 2020, from
  • Schiele, B., Claessens, M., Shi, S. (2012). Science communication in the world: Practices, theories and trends. Dordrecht, New York: Springer.
  • Stocklmayerm S.M. Gilbert, J.K. (2002). New experiences and old knowledge: towards a model for the personal awareness of science and technology. International Journal of Science Education.
  • Sundin et al. (2018). Rethinking communication: integrating storytelling for increased stakeholder engagement in environmental evidence synthesis. Environ Evid, 7:6
  • The Speech Communication Process

The information and views set out in this web-site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein.